[tor-bugs] #6060 [Tor Client]: add http proxy support to Tor
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
torproject-admin at torproject.org
Fri Sep 28 07:38:45 UTC 2012
#6060: add http proxy support to Tor
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: proper | Owner: arma
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: very long term
Component: Tor Client | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Parent: | Points:
Actualpoints: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by ioerror):
Replying to [comment:29 proper]:
> Since Nick unfortunately rejected (or not?) being the http proxy
directly inside Tor AND managing Shim with HttpPort... Here is my
proposal...
>
Well, we should probably back off from mentioning Shim. We don't need shim
per se. I believe we'd just need support for CONNECT and a few other
things. I believe RFC2616 and RFC3143 are relevant here.
> Who says torc may only be phrased by Tor? Users can still add HttPort's
to torrc. Tor is free to ignore them.
>
Indeed - we can do this today with comments. eg:
{{{
#shimListenPort 8080
}}}
That is however totally horrible. We should not take that path for the
love of anonymity.
> The tor-http package (or other name) contains Shim and ALSO phrases
torrc. tor-http forwards the traffic to SocksPort 9050 (or different,
configured in torrc). Each HttpPort will start a Shim instance. Each Shim
instance will use a different SOCKS username for stream isolation.
We could do such a thing if this really is a dead issue. I think we should
not consider that unless we're really hard up. I'd much prefer the tackle
this with a zygote approach.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6060#comment:32>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list