[tor-bugs] #4486 [Analysis]: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#4486: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:  robgjansen
     Type:  task                     |         Status:  assigned  
 Priority:  normal                   |      Milestone:            
Component:  Analysis                 |        Version:            
 Keywords:  performance flowcontrol  |         Parent:  #4506     
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:            
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by robgjansen):

 Replying to [comment:21 robgjansen]:
 > I'm changing my mind and using the #6401 model. The reason is described
 [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4086#comment:33 here].
 >
 > Spinning up simulations now.

 Looks like we may have a bug here (using arma's n23-3 branch).
 {{{
 0:12:1:060570 [thread-0] 0:15:0:361828572 [scallion-error]
 [4uthority-201.2.0.0] [intercept_logv] [tor-err] BUG:
 connection_or_send_flowcontrol() src/or/connection_or.c:1907:
 connection_or_send_flowcontrol: Assertion conn failed; aborting.
 }}}

 I noticed this warning during the build:
 {{{
 src/or/connection_or.c: In function ‘connection_or_send_destroy’:
 src/or/connection_or.c:1889:14: warning: ‘return’ with no value, in
 function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
 }}}

 I've attached
 [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/4486/authority.log.xz
 the info-level logfile] from the node that triggered the bug.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4486#comment:22>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online