[tor-bugs] #5336 [Analysis]: Do simulations of initial proposal 182 patch
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
torproject-admin at torproject.org
Wed Oct 3 21:10:02 UTC 2012
#5336: Do simulations of initial proposal 182 patch
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Analysis | Version:
Keywords: | Parent: #4682
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by karsten):
* status: new => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:18 robgjansen]:
> 1. Print the heartbeat message every second instead of every minute with
$ scallion --heartbeat-frequency=1 …
> 2. The heartbeat message will contain the number of bytes each nodes
sends and receives per second. Match that up with the relay bandwidth
limits to determine if nodes are actually obeying their bandwidth limits.
You probably have to either modify the parse() function in analyze.py, or
write a new script for this.
Done. I wrote my own script and made two graphs: the
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/5336/task5336-bwrate-2012-10-03.png
first graph] compares bandwidth rates to median bandwidths, and the
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/5336/task5336-bwburst-2012-10-03.png
second graph] compares bandwidth bursts to 99th percentiles. For me it
looks like all three branches respect bandwidth rates quite well and do
'''not''' respect bandwidth bursts as much as they should. I do not see
major differences between the three branches. I wonder if there's a
better way to visualize this.
> The per-node memory tracking is not working yet in Shadow, so we'll only
be able to say things about overall memory consumption by looking at the
data/dstat.log file.
I have the three dstat.log files. What do I do with them?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5336#comment:19>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list