[tor-bugs] #5131 [Obfsproxy]: auditing obfsproxy

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#5131: auditing obfsproxy
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ioerror      |          Owner:  asn         
     Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  normal       |      Milestone:              
Component:  Obfsproxy    |        Version:              
 Keywords:  security     |         Parent:              
   Points:               |   Actualpoints:              
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------

Comment(by ioerror):

 Replying to [comment:19 Sebastian]:
 > Well, yes, I think above is the confirmation?
 >
 > As for what's reasonable, I'm not sure if it makes sense to special case
 clang here. > What other compilers are out there? How would they react?

 As confirmed on irc - it doesn't produce an error, even if we make
 warnings into errors because of how clang is abstracted.

 I think the right answer is to turn this on for now and then to augment
 'ax_build_hardening.m4' to add additional flags, perhaps also special
 casing weird compilers issues or normal deviations to ensure that we get
 options that we want, if they are around, etc.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5131#comment:20>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online