[tor-bugs] #6475 [Tor Client]: circuit_send_next_onion_skin(): Bug: Unexpectedly high circuit_successes
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
torproject-admin at torproject.org
Sat Jul 28 02:13:45 UTC 2012
#6475: circuit_send_next_onion_skin(): Bug: Unexpectedly high circuit_successes
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: grarpamp | Owner: mikeperry
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component: Tor Client | Version: Tor: 0.2.3.19-rc
Keywords: MikePerry201208 | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by mikeperry):
* status: new => assigned
* keywords: => MikePerry201208
* cc: nickm@… (removed)
* cc: nickm (added)
* owner: mikeperry@… => mikeperry
* priority: normal => major
Comment:
> I'm seeing hundreds of these:
> [warn] circuit_send_next_onion_skin(): Bug: Unexpectedly high
circuit_successes (M/m) for guard <nick>.
Hundreds of these on a normal client? Are you doing anything atypical?
For example, are you running a hidden service? Running a relay? Running a
network scanner? Using a custom Tor controller?
> There are a few accompanying entries shown below, but note primarily
that the above style uselessly lists only the <nick>, while the below
style needlessly lists it.
> [notice] Low circuit success rate M/n for guard <nick>=<fp>.
You get both this message and the above message for the same guard? I
assume you mean the nicks match still? If so, for now you can still
inspect your tor state to find the guards that have matching success
rates, to verify you have two guards with the same nick but different
EntryGuardPathBias counts.
What ranges of values of M, m, and n have you seen for each case?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6475#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list