[anti-censorship-team] bridgedb+rdsys test setup
David Fifield
david at bamsoftware.com
Mon Feb 28 16:33:51 UTC 2022
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:43:24PM +0100, meskio wrote:
> Quoting David Fifield (2022-02-28 09:54:28)
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:45:50AM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:17:47PM +0100, meskio wrote:
> > > > How to access the different distributors:
> > > > * email. Just write an email to bridges-test at torproject.org from your
> > > > @torproject.org email, and should get a reply with bridges.
> > >
> > > I sent 2 emails from dcf at torproject.org and did not get any reply. One
> > > email had subject "get bridges" and an empty body; the other had an
> > > empty subject and "get transport obfs4" in the body.
> >
> > I spoke too soon. I got a reply to the first email (the one with a
> > subject of "get bridges" and an empty body) after about 6 minutes. (The
> > email's Date header was the same second I sent the message, but the
> > Delivery-date header was 6 minutes later.
> > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:38:53 +0000
> > Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:45:09 +0000
>
> This is pretty weird. I have tested it many times and I always get content in
> the body. I just tested it and it looked good here :(
>
> Might it be that the changes we did to the text[0] are breaking your client (it
> does now contain some UTF-8 characters)? Can you try to open the email with a
> text editor or another email client? Does it look empty? Do you mind forwarding
> me the email?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The email I *sent* had an empty body. The email I
*received* from bridges-test had bridges and instructions in the body as
expected.o
I tested sending an empty body, and separately an empty subject because,
as I recall, in the past there was some confusion about whether BridgeDB
should reply to such messages.
More information about the anti-censorship-team
mailing list