>>  the machine has it's own global unicast ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.

I don't know for sure, but possibly that's causing the issue? I do know tor uses one IP address for relays, so if it is detecting several different IPS that may be confusing it.

It's only a thought.
--Keifer


On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:46 AM Fran <fatal@mailbox.org> wrote:
Hey,

the problem persists. upgraded to several new daily snapshots of openbsd in between, no success.

On 20.07.20 08:30, Keifer Bly wrote:
> It is worth noting, tor conscious does not immediately update. It can take 40 minutes up to about 3 hours for an operating status update to appear in the conscious based on my experience from the
> bridge and middle relay I run.

the relay had been up for > 17 hours (see log excerpt)

>>> Your relay has a very large number of connections to other relays. Is your outbound address the same as your relay address? Found 9 connections to 6 relays. Found 4
>
> What do you mean No FW on the machine?

no firewall

> You need to configure port forwarding on the network for the specific machine / ip address the relay is running on, for both inbound and outbound traffic.

the machine has it's own global unicast ipv4 and ipv6 addresses.

best

fran


> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:40 PM Fran <fatal@mailbox.org <mailto:fatal@mailbox.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     I'm taking care of a server of a friend who's on holiday. The server is up and running but not part of the consensus.
>
>     As beeing instructed I updated to the lastest OpenBSD snapshot when I saw that a new tor release is available  (Tor 0.4.3.5 on OpenBSD).
>
>     Excerpts from the log:
>
>     Jul 13 20:04:02.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent.
>     Jul 13 20:05:02.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
>     Jul 13 20:05:35.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus.
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 6:00 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 2.04 MB and received 6.25 MB.
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 12.450%. TLS write overhead: 33%
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 0/0 TAP, 5/5 NTor.
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] Since startup we initiated 0 and received 157 v1 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v2 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v3 connections; initiated 0 and
>     received 5 v4 connections; initiated 48 and received 124 v5 connections.
>     Jul 14 02:04:01.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many cells. 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. 0
>     INTRODUCE2 rejected.
>     Jul 14 06:04:02.000 [notice] Your relay has a very large number of connections to other relays. Is your outbound address the same as your relay address? Found 9 connections to 6 relays. Found 4
>     current canonical connections, in 0 of which we were a non-canonical peer. 3 relays had more than 1 connection, 0 had more than 2, and 0 had more than 4 connections.
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus.
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 12:00 hours, with 1 circuits open. I've sent 3.46 MB and received 11.22 MB.
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 12.450%. TLS write overhead: 47%
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 2/2 TAP, 1/1 NTor.
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] Since startup we initiated 0 and received 340 v1 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v2 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v3 connections; initiated 0 and
>     received 10 v4 connections; initiated 57 and received 246 v5 connections.
>     Jul 14 08:04:01.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many cells. 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. 0
>     INTRODUCE2 rejected.
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus.
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 18:00 hours, with 1 circuits open. I've sent 4.89 MB and received 15.33 MB.
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 26.760%. TLS write overhead: 51%
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 2/2 TAP, 6/6 NTor.
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] Since startup we initiated 0 and received 493 v1 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v2 connections; initiated 0 and received 0 v3 connections; initiated 0 and
>     received 18 v4 connections; initiated 64 and received 370 v5 connections.
>     Jul 14 14:04:01.000 [notice] DoS mitigation since startup: 0 circuits killed with too many cells. 0 circuits rejected, 0 marked addresses. 0 connections closed. 0 single hop clients refused. 0
>     INTRODUCE2 rejected.
>
>
>     Atlas show the server as down: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/AC601DBDB7FBD53454045EDC08DAE3C381C8CF88
>
>     Accessing the status page on port 80 works.
>     No FW on the machine.
>
>     Any ideas?
>
>     Thanks and regards
>
>     Fran
>     _______________________________________________
>     tor-relays mailing list
>     tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
>     https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays