All same cost: Three servers in different datacenters, each with 10 Gbps unmetered bandwidth.
Identical hardware/software: Each server has 128 threads, 512GB–768GB RAM, and the same software stack.
Diversity benefits: Each server hosts fewer than 10 other relays, enhancing overall network diversity.
Primary differences: Geographic location and upstream peering/routing.

Current Utilization:

Server 1: 2Gbps utilized (20% utilization)
Server 2: 6Gbps utilized (60% utilization)
Server 3: 8Gbps utilized (80% utilization)

Overall, using 16 Gbps out of 30 Gbps purchased -- roughly half our bandwidth is idle / "wasted".

Assuming we can't significantly optimize these servers any further and given the significant under utilization on Server 1 (80% idle) and Server 2 (40% idle), what would you do in this scenario? Some options we’re considering:

Consolidation: Paying only for the servers with the highest utilization.
Repurposing: Allocating the idle bandwidth to another purpose that benefits Tor (or a similar effort).
Reinvestment: Using the funds from Servers 1 and 2 to acquire additional high-utilization capacity (e.g., more of Server 3 configuration) to boost our overall contribution closer to 24 Gbps.
Other strategies: Any alternative approaches you might suggest.