All:

It turns out that this issue was related to PortForwarding to the Private Gateway Address (192.168.0.1:9001).


The solution was to include an iptables ACCEPT Rule in the INPUT Chain to the PortForward destination (the Private Gateway Address - 192.168.0.1:9001).


# iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 9001 -j ACCEPT


# iptables -A VSERVER -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.1:9001


Now, the Tor Self-Test is returning successfully. However, now, there is an issue with the written/read bytes per second graph, on the metrics.torproject.org site, dropping to zero.


Any idea why PortForwarding would cause the written/read bytes per second graph to drop to zero?


Respectfully,



Gary



On Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 7:43:22 AM MDT, Gary C. New <garycnew@yahoo.com> wrote:


All:

After reviewing several packet-traces of Tor bound directly to the Public Address:Port vs Tor bound to the Private Address:Port and Advertising the Public Address:Port, I believe I may have found the the issue.

It appears that when Tor is bound directly to the Public Address:Port, the initial measurement connections are initiated from External Tor Nodes via High-Ports to the Public Address:Port over TLSv1.2 or TLSv1.3 successfully passing self-test. However, when Tor is bound to the Private Address:Port and Advertising the Public Address:Port, the initial measurement connections are initiated from External Tor Nodes via High-Ports to the Public Address:Port over TLSv1.0. Tor does not like the TLSv1.0 connections and Resets the them; thus, failing the self-test.

The question is... Why are the initial measurement connections initiated from External Tor Nodes via High-Ports with the Private Address:Port binding and Public Advertised Address:Port combination over TLSv1.0?

Has anyone successfully implemented the Private Address:Port binding and Public Advertised Address:Port combination that successfully passes self-test whom would be kind enough to share their configuration?

Is there a way to force the External Tor Nodes that initiate the measurement connections to use TLSv1.2 or TLSv1.3 with the Private Address:Port binding and Public Advertised Address:Port combination?

Thanks, again, for your assistance.

Respectfully,


Gary


On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 2:47:01 AM PDT, Gary C. New <garycnew@yahoo.com> wrote:


David,

The ISP has port 9001 blocked to the Public Address.

Do the ports have to be the same, when using NoAdvertise & NoListen with the ORPort directive?

Thanks!


Gary


On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 12:20:36 AM MDT, David Figuera <dfb@mm.st> wrote:


> ORPort 198.91.60.78:443 NoListen
> ORPort 192.168.0.1:9001 NoAdvertise


Why two different ports?
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays