This thread did go goofy and bad (and off-topic, given the subject in the emails). It seems clear that there are important reasons Tor could never begin examining/taking direct responsibility for/filtering the content that flows through it (as opposed with disallowing specific ports, which is different). Asking for this seems naive.
On Saturday 31/08/2013 at 8:54 am, Steve Snyder wrote:
On 08/30/2013 08:05 PM, Andrea Shepard wrote:
[snip]
If I were going to work on filtering by technical means, it'd be filters to
keep neo-Puritans like you out of my life, thanks.
Well said. This whole thread is example 87653478965432 of the
"censorship is A-OK if I don't like it" mindset.
Maybe we need a competitor to Tor, a privacy network that only allows
pictures of cute kittens and puppies as traffic.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays