I should point out that the complaint wasn't sent to me directly, but somebody I know saw it on a usenet group and forwarded it, asking whether the Tor community was aware of it.

So as Roger points out, it's not a "routine" complaint, and in fact the complainant appears to know about and understand Tor. The complaint is in fact against Google so I think ignoring it would be the right course of action in this case as I don't want to be caught up in some anti-Google argument, regardless of what the detail of the issues are.

Jonathan


On 25 February 2013 10:52, Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:15:01AM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
>  I'd explain what Tor, why it is
> important to have Tor around and how the complainer could block traffic
> from Tor exit nodes if really needed.

In this particular case, I assume the complainer is "some dude upset
about what's getting posted via google groups". So the usual answer
(https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq-abuse#Bans) doesn't apply to him,
since he can't make any decisions on behalf of Google.

I can see how he'd be frustrated, and how he'd resort to mailing Tor
exit relay operators one-by-one in hopes of solving his problem.

But I can also see how it won't solve his problem.

--Roger

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays