2017-11-23 18:23 GMT+00:00 Toralf Förster <
toralf.foerster@gmx.de>:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/23/2017 03:10 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> > One note, 9.9.9.10 does no filtering, but sadly also doesn't enforce
> > DNSSEC. It has the same privacy policy and similar.
> The former is good, the later not a problem, b/c DNSSEC validation has to be made by the client nevertheless.
>
> I do persoanlly use 9.9.9.10 together with dnsmasq (whihc does the DNSSEC job) at my desktop b/c I couldn't get DNSSEC woring with the DNS servs of my ADSL provider here in Hamburg.
>
> - --
> Toralf
> PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWhcSCRccdG9yYWxmLmZv
> ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTjRxAPwMNZQCFk7av7cyMbRCjCyqIPq4
> 91jnvwX6lLXnL9bEywEAhaZgeF3oFKvRENSMJls/NeSHm/jfCXGjrQ/0/yaGChQ=
> =zma+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
you are invited to read the code before running/testing. feel free to modify, or w/e.