>>I am wondering why only 68 out of 283 completed the traceroute. Can someone
>>explain please?

I would like to mention that though we received data from 283 different IPs, it doesn't mean that there are 283 unique relays some of the relays use dynamic IPs so over time they send data from more than one IP.

Thanks

Anupam




On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Sebastian Urbach <sebastian@urbach.org> wrote:
Hi Mick,

Thank you for running multiple turns and your time frame info as well :-)

--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours

Sebastian Urbach

----------------------------------------------
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety.
----------------------------------------------
Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790),  Inventor,
journalist, printer, diplomat, and statesman



On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:04:01 +0100
Sebastian Urbach <sebastian@urbach.org> allegedly wrote:
My system, as an example, took about 2 days and 23 hours to complete
the run. I use scamper with the default settings. You can also turn
up the pps value and finish even faster.
How long will this take?:
http://web.engr.illinois.edu/~das17/tor-traceroute_v1.html#q-howlong
How much bandwidth, disk space, RAM, and CPU will this consume?:
http://web.engr.illinois.edu/~das17/tor-traceroute_v1.html#q-howmanyresources

Fo info, my relay (512MB RAM, 1 core VPS) finshed the scamper run
(with default settings) in just over 3.5 days. I've just kicked off a
second run.

Mick
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Mick Morgan
gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B  72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
http://baldric.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays