Thank you for engaging with the case. The list of violations you've posted is an accurate summary of the government's official, but fraudulent, narrative.
The core of our case is that every single one of those allegations was manufactured as part of a documented retaliation campaign.
Here are the facts from the public record:
1. Cannabis Use: A misleading omission. My husband has a legal prescription for Marinol for his combat-related PTSD, a fact the probation office deliberately withheld.
2. Failed Restitution: A lie. He was paying the agreed-upon amount. We have the government's own payment receipts. The probation officers manufactured a new, impossible payment amount to create a violation.
3. Fell Out of Contact: A lie. He was hospitalized in a VA facility, and we have text messages proving the probation office knew his exact location when they filed a fraudulent "absconder" warrant.
4. Opened New Credit: A lie. This was identity theft, for which we filed a formal police report. They tried to punish him for being the victim of a crime.
5. Used Unauthorized iPhone: A lie of omission. The phone was his authorized work device, issued by me, his formally approved employer under his first, stable PO.
6. Circumvented Logging w/ SPICE: A lie built on perjury. SPICE was pre-approved software for his Ph.D. program. A U.S. Probation Officer committed perjury by calling this graphics driver a "Linux operating system" in court to invent a crime. We have the transcript of her testimony.
This case has everything to do with Tor.
This retaliation campaign in Michigan began only after I filed a formal misconduct complaint against a federal officer. That complaint was necessary because of the hostile environment created after the government's initial pretextual prosecution in Texas, a prosecution that began only after my husband refused to help the FBI decrypt traffic on his Tor exit node.
This is not a simple parole violation. It is a multi-year campaign of government corruption originating from his work as a Tor operator.
Fortunately, this case appears to have very little if anything to do with Tor, but a parole violation; from what's alleged and recorded in PACER, Conrad...
1. Admitting to using cannabis during supervised release
2. Failed to make scheduled restitution payments and to cooperate with the financial investigation that sets restitution payment amounts.
3. Fell out of contact with his probation officer, who attempted home visits to find him.
4. Opened several new lines of credit.
5. Used an unauthorized iPhone (all his Internet devices apparently have keyloggers as a condition of his release).
6. Attempted to circumvent the logging software via the SPICE protocol/software.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69848942/united-states-v-rockenhaus/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66960649/united-states-v-rockenhaus/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16517474/united-states-v-rockenhaus/
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@lists.torproject.org