I cant upgrade the machine, I'd have to buy hardware and since the machine is 12 years old, I have no intention of replacing the failing parts. I am slowly building a replacement server, but until then, Xp it is. I do not browse, read email, open PDFs, run Flash, install programs - I dont do anything on that server besides running the Tor relay (and polipo) and serving files on the local network. The machine is behind a hardware and a software firewall. The chances of infection is basically zero, so there is no great rush to setup the replacement server.On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:30 PM, B00ze/Empire <B00ze64@hotmail.com> wrote:
Who cares that MS doesn't support it. So you are claiming that because it runs on Xp the speed testing is failing? I find that hard to believe.
Everyone using Tor cares. I believe the other posters are seizing on this detail because it is much more important for you to upgrade your vulnerable machine than to worry about what speed is reported. Perhaps it is better for now that your speed is under-reported, to keep too many clients from connecting to a potentially dangerous relay.
-- _\|/_ Sylvain / B00ze64@hotmail.com (o o) Member-+-David-Suzuki-Foundation-+-Planetary-Society- oO-( )-Oo C Error #009: FATAL! Portable code found!