Re: [tor-qa] Urgent: test stable 64-bit Linux TBBs (Checksec)

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Erinn Clark <erinn@double-helix.org> wrote:
Another update. Use this one instead:
https://people.torproject.org/~erinn/qa/stable/tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-... 182a3ff7b5a707cbc84c6919f3c6514e4561c583bf754df0e8c91067f6ab4f73 tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-2.3.25-9-dev-en-US-TEST2.tar.gz
From Tobias Klein's checksec (http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.html).
***** tor-browser_en-US$ checksec.sh --file App/vidalia RELRO STACK CANARY NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH FILE No RELRO No canary found NX enabled No PIE No RPATH No RUNPATH App/vidalia Missing --stack-protector or --stack-protector-all, -fPIE, -pie, -Wl,-zrelro and -Wl,-z,now. Probably missing FORTIFY_SOURCES=2 ***** tor-browser_en-US$ checksec.sh --file App/Firefox/firefox RELRO STACK CANARY NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH FILE No RELRO No canary found NX enabled No PIE No RPATH No RUNPATH App/Firefox/firefox Missing --stack-protector or --stack-protector-all, -fPIE, -pie, -Wl,-zrelro and -Wl,-z,now. Probably missing FORTIFY_SOURCES=2 ***** tor-browser_en-US$ checksec.sh --file App/tor RELRO STACK CANARY NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH FILE Full RELRO No canary found NX enabled No PIE RPATH No RUNPATH App/tor Missing --stack-protector or --stack-protector-all, -fPIE, -pie, -Wl,-zrelro and -Wl,-z,now. Probably missing FORTIFY_SOURCES=2
participants (1)
-
Jeffrey Walton