Infographic about Pluggable Transports
Attention: Metrics, UX and PT teams =================================== I'm working on an infographic about Pluggable Transport, that is ideally going to help educating both end-users and bridge operators (including potential bridge operators). I've prepared a list of things we could cover on this. Please review and let me know if there's anything I've missed that should be added to the list. This infographic is going to have two sections, the first part is more of a how-to. Showing 6-8 steps, demonstrating how to download Tor Browser and configuring it to use a PT to connect to Tor network. The second part, is the actual infographic part: - List of PTs included in Tor Browser with a one-line summary and significance of each - List of PTs under development - Stats + Total number of PT bridges + Average number of PT clients per day + Maybe compare the numbers with direct connections? - Links to PT page (on website and wiki) What are other interesting numbers about PT world? Is there anything else I should add to this? I was thinking about adding average traffic the default bridges are getting per mounth, since it's very significant. 'Azadi' alone has transferred more than 103 TBytes since Feb: month rx | tx | total | avg. rate ------------------------+-------------+-------------+--------------- Feb '16 12.07 TiB | 13.48 TiB | 25.56 TiB | 87.62 Mbit/s Mar '16 16.81 TiB | 18.84 TiB | 35.64 TiB | 114.31 Mbit/s Apr '16 11.17 TiB | 12.59 TiB | 23.76 TiB | 78.74 Mbit/s May '16 7.16 TiB | 8.07 TiB | 15.23 TiB | 48.84 Mbit/s Jun '16 1.55 TiB | 1.73 TiB | 3.28 TiB | 57.62 Mbit/s Best, -- Nima 0XC009DB191C92A77B | @mrphs "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" --Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Nima Fatemi <nima@torproject.org> writes:
[ text/plain ] Attention: Metrics, UX and PT teams ===================================
I'm working on an infographic about Pluggable Transport, that is ideally going to help educating both end-users and bridge operators (including potential bridge operators). I've prepared a list of things we could cover on this. Please review and let me know if there's anything I've missed that should be added to the list.
This infographic is going to have two sections, the first part is more of a how-to. Showing 6-8 steps, demonstrating how to download Tor Browser and configuring it to use a PT to connect to Tor network.
The second part, is the actual infographic part:
- List of PTs included in Tor Browser with a one-line summary and significance of each
- List of PTs under development
- Stats + Total number of PT bridges + Average number of PT clients per day + Maybe compare the numbers with direct connections?
- Links to PT page (on website and wiki)
What are other interesting numbers about PT world?
Hello Nima, I think such an infographic will be quite interesting. I feel that some of the most important PT numbers we are missing have to do with the bridge distribution problem. The way I see it, PTs and BridgeDB are two pieces of the same puzzle, and weirdly I've never seen any statistics from BridgeDB. Specifically, here are some example statistics that I would find interesting: - How many clients use BridgeDB? - Which distributors are used most? - Which PTs are asked most? - What % of clients are using Tor vs connecting directly? - What are the most popular client countries? - How many unique bridges does BridgeDB give out daily/weekly - Did BridgeDB usage decrease with the introduction of meek? Some of the above statistics might also require some privacy-preserving obfuscation before publishing. I'm still not sure why we have no statistics on BridgeDB. It seems something that could point us to future research directions, and generally help us in strategizing against censors.
Thanks for such a great input, George! Hello Isis,
I think such an infographic will be quite interesting.
I feel that some of the most important PT numbers we are missing have to do with the bridge distribution problem. The way I see it, PTs and BridgeDB are two pieces of the same puzzle, and weirdly I've never seen any statistics from BridgeDB.
Specifically, here are some example statistics that I would find interesting:
- How many clients use BridgeDB? - Which distributors are used most? - Which PTs are asked most? - What % of clients are using Tor vs connecting directly? - What are the most popular client countries? - How many unique bridges does BridgeDB give out daily/weekly - Did BridgeDB usage decrease with the introduction of meek?
Some of the above statistics might also require some privacy-preserving obfuscation before publishing.
Is it feasible and easy to extract (any of) the information George listed above? I need to have all the information we want to put on this infographic by the end of next week.
I'm still not sure why we have no statistics on BridgeDB. It seems something that could point us to future research directions, and generally help us in strategizing against censors.
I've created https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19332 for this. -- Nima 0X58C4B928A3E218F6 | @mrphs "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" --Evelyn Beatrice Hall
Hello there, This is a great idea Nima, thanks for putting it together. I think before collecting data (which might take more work than we think, who knows) we should review the audience we are focusing here and what stories we want to tell in the infograph then list the data we should get. Infograph are stories, we will start with the story that tells how to use it. Then there is another section with other stories -- if our focus is for new users or users who doesn't know PT because never had to used it, than listing some of these things might just confuse more than help or be too much information. On 06/07/2016 09:11 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
Nima Fatemi <nima@torproject.org> writes:
- List of PTs included in Tor Browser with a one-line summary and significance of each
I think this is a great thing. Based on David and Linda's research people tend to just pick the first option in the drop-down menu. This will help educate people what the other options are etc. People also don't understand all those PTs names listed there, what is the difference etc :)
- List of PTs under development
I think this goes in the 'extra weight' package if our public is the one I describe above.
- Stats + Total number of PT bridges + Average number of PT clients per day + Maybe compare the numbers with direct connections?
I think we should tell a story with this information -- is much better for someone to digest and understand the meaning of numbers this way. For instance, instead of just saying the average clients per day we could (also?) give a real world case of a censorship event and the usage growth due to it.
- Links to PT page (on website and wiki)
Sounds good.
Specifically, here are some example statistics that I would find interesting:
- How many clients use BridgeDB? - Which distributors are used most? - Which PTs are asked most? - What % of clients are using Tor vs connecting directly? - What are the most popular client countries? - How many unique bridges does BridgeDB give out daily/weekly - Did BridgeDB usage decrease with the introduction of meek?
Some of the above statistics might also require some privacy-preserving obfuscation before publishing.
I'm still not sure why we have no statistics on BridgeDB. It seems something that could point us to future research directions, and generally help us in strategizing against censors.
I would do the same thing here, based on the audience, do we need all this? I am happy to join a session on irc to look for what data/story we could tell on the infograph. I just can't do it today because of other work I said I would get done. Cheers, Isabela
_______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project '
-- PM at TorProject.org gpg fingerprint = 8F2A F9B6 D4A1 4D03 FDF1 B298 3224 4994 1506 4C7B @isa
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/16 23:02, Isabela wrote:
Hello there,
Hi everyone,
This is a great idea Nima, thanks for putting it together.
Agreed.
I think before collecting data (which might take more work than we think, who knows) we should review the audience we are focusing here and what stories we want to tell in the infograph then list the data we should get.
Infograph are stories, we will start with the story that tells how to use it. Then there is another section with other stories -- if our focus is for new users or users who doesn't know PT because never had to used it, than listing some of these things might just confuse more than help or be too much information.
On 06/07/2016 09:11 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
Nima Fatemi <nima@torproject.org> writes:
- List of PTs included in Tor Browser with a one-line summary and significance of each
I think this is a great thing. Based on David and Linda's research people tend to just pick the first option in the drop-down menu. This will help educate people what the other options are etc. People also don't understand all those PTs names listed there, what is the difference etc :)
- List of PTs under development
I think this goes in the 'extra weight' package if our public is the one I describe above.
- Stats + Total number of PT bridges
Just in case you don't go with a real-world example as Isabela suggests (which I think is a good idea), I can help with getting some data on total number of PT bridges. I think I'll need to write some code for this (though it feels like a familiar use case that I surely must have written code for in the past). Just tell me for which time period you'd want these numbers. But please be optimistic that you'll use these numbers, because I'd write this code specifically for you.
+ Average number of PT clients per day + Maybe compare the numbers with direct connections?
Well, we already have graphs and data for this on Tor Metrics. You should be able to get the numbers from there.
I think we should tell a story with this information -- is much better for someone to digest and understand the meaning of numbers this way.
For instance, instead of just saying the average clients per day we could (also?) give a real world case of a censorship event and the usage growth due to it.
- Links to PT page (on website and wiki)
Sounds good.
Specifically, here are some example statistics that I would find interesting:
- How many clients use BridgeDB? - Which distributors are used most? - Which PTs are asked most? - What % of clients are using Tor vs connecting directly? - What are the most popular client countries? - How many unique bridges does BridgeDB give out daily/weekly
These all sound like interesting questions.
- Did BridgeDB usage decrease with the introduction of meek?
This one might be a bit hard to answer without a time machine.
Some of the above statistics might also require some privacy-preserving obfuscation before publishing.
Is it feasible and easy to extract (any of) the information George listed above? I need to have all the information we want to put on this infographic by the end of next week.
Wait, what? End of next week? This year or next? Or under the assumption that time machines exist? I seriously hope there's no way to extract this information from existing data, because that would mean that BridgeDB logs all kinds of stuff about its users, and I strongly believe it doesn't do such a horrible thing. And if you meant that we could write a small hack to BridgeDB to dump some usage information to disk which we would then include in this infographic, then no, I'm almost certain that we wouldn't do such a horrible thing. We have processes for extracting new information about users in a privacy-preserving way. These processes include publishing a proposal, getting it reviewed on tor-dev@, implementing and testing statistics code, getting that publicly reviewed, publishing the resulting data, and only then using that data. This can take weeks if not months. But I'll just hope you meant something else.
I'm still not sure why we have no statistics on BridgeDB. It seems something that could point us to future research directions, and generally help us in strategizing against censors.
I've created https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19332 for this.
Again, don't underestimate the effort there. And these things usually happen faster if somebody submits a patch.
I would do the same thing here, based on the audience, do we need all this?
Good point.
I am happy to join a session on irc to look for what data/story we could tell on the infograph. I just can't do it today because of other work I said I would get done.
I can't commit to joining such a session, but if there's anything I can help with that we can extract from existing data, please let me know. All the best, Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXXCVgAAoJEC3ESO/4X7XBHsEIAKIxCx5vC6WzXmA4+3hr+/Mq VgL7OOF7U/1dCW60igeDZ1dtUFfZo51Jw5WX3pacu/7y3+ul2mDxgq+X0/7F2JB/ Pw3EtCGKEaJVAZzPrRbIDcJ7qA8wk79hwZoYENQKYth9hKhYQ2OdRy2tJADDHTjo f67e+pGkPwj66T/S/Rkkg6s8vukPdbw9ShpYv6Va+QF9cYNtIsn5d4G0jc9pxxCZ F7V8IBFv8Qbi2oSTp4fsRoF5Ufby7uIr2feD6mycAXTpvt+QH4XxudpN4wfrgh0j S6vky/pdm0TgUv4QAwCEfTFKtH3GNb4p72DrxFxmCD4N/ZgUueLOSXFmWn9RtGI= =USmf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
George Kadianakis -
Isabela -
Karsten Loesing -
Nima Fatemi