[TSoP 2018] Bandwidth scanner update - report #3

Hi, since report #2, these are the tasks i have worked on: Tor directory protocol: ------------------------ - started to work on specification for archiving bandwidth files [0] Bandwidth List format specification: -------------------------------------- - possible text to add regarding limiting measured bandwidth to MaxAdvertisedBandwidth [1] - fix Bandwidth file Timestamp is the latest scanner result, not the file creation time [2] little-t-tor -------------- - add test to check that descriptor is only updated on bandwidth changes when uptime is less than a day [3] - started to work on what makes some relays to advertise zero bandwidth-observed [4] Simple Bandwidth Scanner (sbws): --------------------------------- - keep previous bandwidth files and rename them to the date when they are generated [5] - run sbws with different python versions to find which ones fail with python lru_cache [6] - fix bandwidth file's earliest bandwidth [7] - fix node_id in bandwidth file to start with "$" [8] - find a bug when running sbws with python 3.4.2 [9] - find a bug when running sbws with python 3.4.5 [10] - fix a bug when there is not enough RAM [11] - suggest moving plotting scripts to other repo [12] - review limiting measured bandwidth to the advertised bandwidth [13] - review new Relay class [14] - discuss possible solutions when stem controller fails [15] - review integration test for RelayPrioritizer [16] [0] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21378 [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8494 [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26155 [3] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24104 [4] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24104 [5] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/179 [6] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/198, https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/193 [7] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/pull/187 [8] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/pull/188 [9] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/194 [10] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/203 [11] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/195, https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/pull/196 [12] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/201 [13] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/pull/191 [14] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/180 [15] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/issues/192 [16] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-scanner/pull/206
participants (1)
-
juga