On 4 May 2016, at 19:19, Sebastian Hahn mail@sebastianhahn.net wrote:
On 04 May 2016, at 11:02, Roger Dingledine arma@mit.edu wrote:
That said, we are still very inconsistent about how we use these terms in many other places.
Agreed. I had an idea to do the terminology switchover on the Tor website just before the 32c3 onion services talk, and then announce it there. I didn't get enough momentum to do it then, but I'm still a fan.
It seemed like the consensus was to conicide the release of new onion service scheme with the naming change. I think that's a good idea. Anything that says hidden service will refer to the thing we have now, onion services are the more secure thing that we'll have then.
Makes sense to me. I'm also happy with a gradual transition to "onion service" as we are developing proposal 224.
Tim
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n