Hello again,
On 01/02/2018 07:12 AM, isabela wrote:
Hi Gunner!
Happy 20018!
Same to you!
On 1/1/18 7:11 PM, Allen Gunn wrote:
Big thanks to GeKo, who first confirmed for me that no such documentation seems to exist. And then for helping me to bootstrap this page:
https://pad.riseup.net/p/torfriendlysite
I'm writing to ask folks on this list to both add any thoughts you have on the matter, and to correct or comment on anything that's already there and doesn't seem quite right.
Any contributions, both to the pad or emailed to me directly, are most appreciated.
This is great stuff, I added a small comment there too.
Thanks!
As we are redesigning the website and creating new portals the UX team is following this philosophy as well, it must work on TB high level security level first, that is our focus. But we haven't put anything on paper like you did and that is great.
Glad to know we are working on parallel paths.
This is not necessary related to building a site that works on Tor, but more related to building a site related to the Tor Project somehow and that you would like to follow our guidelines, that Antonela and Hiro has been working on:
Thanks. Did you make any design decisions on putting up that site that are relevant for the guidelines?
Which is a fork of some of bootstrap components with the CSS changed to follow our guidelines (colors and fonts for instance).> Looking at your pad makes me think that we should add some stuff related to not only make it looks like is part of the Tor 'brand' but also make it work at Tor Browser high security level.
That makes sense. To build on George's earlier point, I wonder if there is benefit in an actual set of testing steps to be articulated for a site to confirm tor-friendly status...would be harder to test any server-side aspects.
peace, gunner
thans for sharing, isabela _______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project