3 Aug
2016
3 Aug
'16
11:22 a.m.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016, at 04:45 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Nathan wrote:
I agree corporate/commercial licensing is a great option for sustainable revenue generation. Let's make sure this allows for that. In the case of Moxie, his software is not free to developers who was to incorporate it into non GPL software.
The Social Contract is probably not the place to debate (or record the result of debate about) the specific license used for Tor software.
Nathan seems to have an issue with GPL licensed software. But his argument undercuts his point.
I have no issue with it, and license as much of my own software under GPL as possible. I agree it creates a great opportunity for licensing revenue that Tor does not have, at least with the core tor daemon.
+n