Damian Johnson:
I'd be fine with the following alternative for a vote: ask on tor-internal@ if anyone opposes to the ratification of the social contract. If after two weeks zero people object then it's ratified.
If at least one person says nay it goes to a vote.
That's not a good idea. You would basically say "no" as you want to have a vote and then we'd have a vote. That would basically boil down to you saying "It's getting a vote because I, Damian, say it gets a vote."
Georg
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Alison macrina@riseup.net wrote:
Silvia [Hiro]:
On 04/04/17 20:52, Georg Koppen wrote: [snip]
So, let's drop that re-ratifying idea of the same things altogether. It creates more problems than it solves and does not add more legitimacy to previous decisions.
Totally agree w/ this.
-silvia
I am totally fine to go with whatever is preferred by the majority. I initiated the proposal because I had a few requests for it. I know that Damian is one of the people who really wants a vote; I'm happy to leave this open for a few days and see if anyone else agrees with him.
Alison _______________________________________________ tor-project mailing list tor-project@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project
tor-project mailing list tor-project@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project