On Apr 24, 2023, at 6:40 PM, Tobias Pulls tobias.pulls@kau.se wrote:
More refined labeling please!
Understood. We’ll consider your feedback and see if we might be able to safely produce more informative labels.
It's not a replacement for implementations and real-defended datasets though, I hope we can agree on?
[snip]
We want more implemented and ultimately deployed defenses, right?
I absolutely agree!
Our dataset might be more immediately useful for evaluating attacks, but I don’t see how it hurts our ability to evaluate defenses. Defenses should still be implemented and evaluated in network-wide tests as before [0]. The best way I know how to do that is to first use Shadow for full network testing of a variety of candidate defenses before moving the best to the live Tor network. And I think our dataset could help make the Shadow part more realistic.
Peace, love, and positivity, Rob
[0] "Padding-only Defenses Add Delay in Tor” https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~hoppernj/padding_delay_wpes.pdf