On 31 Jan 2016, at 21:31, Alec Muffett <alec.muffett@gmail.com> wrote:
#tor-onions on OFTC?
It would make sense, wouldn't it? Seems to work for me! Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
On 31 Jan (10:31:11), Alec Muffett wrote:
#tor-onions on OFTC?
Although this could be useful, we should be careful of not creating too many channels of communication. Remember that anything that will discussed on that IRC channel won't be "public" so it won't benefit anyone over time unless people actively reading the channel. So ofc I can't stop you from joining the channel and using it :) but we should try as much as we can to use this mailing list for discussions. Thanks! David
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:10PM +0100, MacLemon wrote:
Yes, this is probably so, but I don't think we'll get critical mass, for the simple reason that there's no clear place to move to. We moved from freenode to oftc, long ago, because oftc had better policies around Tor (and they still do). Some fans have suggested that Tor should set up and run its own irc network. I don't think this is a wise use of our energy. Long-term I'd like somebody to experiment with an irc proxy that implements anonymous blacklisting, so we can allow Tor users while also banning jerks: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/call-arms-helping-internet-services-accept-... But we are now off-topic for this list. :) --Roger
participants (5)
-
Alec Muffett -
David Goulet -
MacLemon -
Roger Dingledine -
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor