Paul Syverson:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:22:31PM -0500, Aaron Johnson wrote:
All qualitative labels will have this problem: Free, Libre, Open, Closed, Hidden, Public, Private ... all of these describe an abstract intent, rather than a technology. Such qualitative label-names are inevitably presumptuous of {some} implementer's intent.
I am definitely arguing to convey intent rather than to convey technical implementation. We had reached an equilibrium with “single onion services” that nickm upset because it didn’t properly convey intent.
Well I remain completely opposed to anything conveying intent and regard that as just a mistake for our purposes.
<cut>
I favor:
"onion services" for all kinds of err onion services "single onion services" for all kinds of err single onion services
<cut>
A possible compromise I'm mixed about, but hey compromise
plain onion services or simple onion services
(Keep rendezvous as needed).
<cut>
How about "fast onion services"? That is the real intent, right?