I agree that the destruction of logs that would identify the recipients of Tor content is a Good Thing.
I'm keeping logs for now because my mirror has only been up for 19 days, and during a period of largely unchanging content at that. I want to know that all is well before I start discarding info needed to diagnose a problem.
On 02/10/2013 07:21 PM, AskApache Webmaster wrote:
And yes, I just recently deleted all my old apache logs and changed my log rotate to run a bash script that deletes the logs regularly. I'm also open to setting my error log and custom log to /dev/null
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 10, 2013, at 7:16 PM, AskApache Webmaster webmaster@askapache.com wrote:
Need to get the word out to more people to use it, I personally am 100% happy with tor as it is. My bandwidth is like 3x that. Mostly legitimate I'd say.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 10, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Steve Snyder swsnyder@snydernet.net wrote:
On 02/10/2013 10:26 AM, Jonathan W wrote:
Just a follow up, I was wondering if anyone knew the average bandwidth consumption?
I don't know how representative my mirror is, but I'll tell you my stats.
My Chicago-based mirror syncs with torproject.org/tor/ every 4 hours. In the first 10 days of this month I received 2.5GB and transmitted 83MB. Looking at the logs I see that the majority of requests are from various indexing entities, primarily Googlebot and Baiduspider.
Note that the stable Tor hasn't been updated for nearly 3 months and the only recent TorBrowser update was immediately followed by an advisement not to download it (due to OpenSSL breakage). I assume that requests for actual mirror content would be higher were there to be highly-sought-after new content to download.
That's my $0.02. _______________________________________________ tor-mirrors mailing list tor-mirrors@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors
tor-mirrors mailing list tor-mirrors@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-mirrors