Jesse V <
kernelcorn@riseup.net> writes:
David,
I'm in the midst of reworking my OnioNS design around prop250 (and the security
analysis therein) and as far as I can tell these changes make sense. I like the
00:00 -> 24:00 change as it's more intuitive as you said. I was at first very
concerned that you removed the majority requirement as that is the assumption
made during consensus generation, but I think your argument for the new conflict
resolution make sense. I'm excited that the implementation is nearly complete
and I look forward to seeing it in Tor infrastructure!
Hello Jesse,
thanks for the feedback. Any opinions on whether we should keep the conflict
lines or forget about them, based on David's email and my email?
I just estimated that removing the conflict feature will kill about 400 lines of
code, which is always nice :)