Hi,

  I see both Ravi and Damian have contributed fixes to extend_circuit in the last few days, including better examples.  Please try your test with the latest version in the repository <https://gitweb.torproject.org/stem.git>.  Let us know whether this works for you.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:21 PM, succer110@tiscali.it <succer110@tiscali.it> wrote:
Hi
From your code,  does not seems possible to create new circuits specifying fingerprint. 
https://stem.readthedocs.org/en/latest/_modules/stem/control.html#Controller.extend_circuit 
Also i don't think it's possibile to extendcircuits with fingerprint from command line with control port... i've tried but i failed.
This sounds very strange to me: it should be possibile to create circuits with the 500 "unnamed" router constantly connected!
Where Am I wrong?
Thankyou
----Messaggio originale----
Da: atagar@torproject.org
Data: 30/11/2012 2.21
A: <tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
Ogg: Re: [tor-dev] questions about extending circuit

Hi. Both HackerSpaceSeoul and HackerspaceSeoul lack the named flag,
which likely is why tor isn't allowing you to refer to it by the
nickname. Have you tried referring to it by the fingerprint instead?

Speaking of which, TorCtl is being deprecated in favor of a couple
newer controller libraries...

https://stem.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ - replacement with a similar
design to TorCtl, see the tutorial for usage
https://txtorcon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ - twisted controller library

If you try using stem then let me know if run into any issues or have
questions! -Damian



--
Sean Robinson