On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:58 PM, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:

Hi,

our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.

While running the build and cache update of it from
current git HEAD on the anonbib.cfg I noticed a number of
outdated and broken links.

I'm currently playing with 2 options: re-use anonbib as it is
and change the style + some of its content (for us at GNUnet)
or write something similar to it.
>From my perspective option 1 would be the best as we could
work on fixing links together, keep the content up-to-date
and at the same time keep the duplicate efforts and work
down to a minimum.

What do you think?

Hi! I'd love to have more people working on the anonbib content. The code itself is an old yucky kludge to which I feel no strong attachment, and the generated HTML is also in need of a revamp.

So, "patches welcome"!

Nick