It looks like Atlas is essentially a static application where everything runs client side.

Globe has a has a node.js backend. Is there any actually need for state to persist within the application?

Atlas looks like a cleaner system in many ways.

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:40 AM, isis <isis@torproject.org> wrote:

Abhiram Chintangal transcribed 4.6K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> Sounds interesting. Is it any different from Atlas? It looks like both of
> them are similar in functionality.
>

They are roughly the same in features. Originally, only Globe allowed people
to look up bridge relays, both by fingerprint, hashed, and double hashed
fingerprint, but Atlas now has those features as well. IMO, Atlas is has
better aesthetics, although perhaps it could use more interactivity on its
charts. Essentially, they are the same.

Perhaps you have a good point? Should we be focusing efforts on either Atlas
or Globe, rather than both?

--
♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
_________________________________________________________
OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev