Moritz Bartl,

It sounds cool to provide context menus rather than only stick with manual upload. So I feel the extension will come up with both options to use context menus as well as upload contents manually. Initially I'm working on the context menus to encrypt messages. I will get back to you with the initial UI parts first.

Sorry about the less descriptive steps in "How

Alice's side works" and "How Bob's side works" part. I will try to draw a proper one later in the progress.

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:53 PM,

Moritz Bartl <moritz@torservers.net> wrote:

Hi Hareesan,

Thank you for taking this on!

The crucial parts are the interfaces to the steganography plugins, and
how they signal what kind of data they can process (html, image, video,
...). I don't think it will scale if we just dump all data into all
plugins for processing. (see comment below)

For the user interface, apart from the ability to select local files as
carrier, I think it would be neat to be able to select content from
websites (like: right click on image, select "embed secret"). Payload is
either textual (entered via form), or binary (file selection).

To encrypt the payload before embedding, a private/public key scheme was
proposed. I prefer ECC over RSA. You mention SJCL, which has an ECC branch.

> Once Bob open a web site with web contents which he wants to check if
> it contains any messages steganographically hidden, he will click on
> the extension icon Figure 5. All the items in the page will be
> displayed in the extension with decrypt option.

We discussed earlier that the extension, together with its steganography
addons, should have the capability to automatically find matching
payload while browsing. Depending on the algorithms, this may or may not
be feasable, so users may want to disable this for certain types of
content, algorithms (plugins), or only enable scanning for specific
sites. (which you outline in Figure 6)

Personally, for the manual scan/decrypt, I'd like to see an option in
the context menu when I right-click an image or other content.

I was not able to completely follow the steps you describe in "How
Alice's side works" and "How Bob's side works". The charts look neat,
but are not ideal to describe the process.

The situation of usable javascript steganography libraries does not look
too good. For the GSoC project, we should not waste too much time on
this, and focus on the surrounding extension and clean interfaces to
potential libraries. If we have time left, we can investigate what kind
of algorithms we would like to see implemented/ported in Javascript.

--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

--
Hareesan

It's more fun to be a pirate than join the Navy.
-Steve Jobs-