-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ian,

Thanks for the link, and for working on the survey - this was long overdue. I especially enjoy the mind map (Figure 5) which gives a quick view of all of the work over the years. The community has been busy!

On the incentives front, I believe the survey is missing a few papers.

- -"Proof-of-Work as Anonymous Micropayment: Rewarding a Tor Relay"
  FC 2015 Short Paper, http://fc15.ifca.ai/preproceedings/paper_71.pdf
- -"Paying the Guard: an Entry-Guard-based Payment System for Tor"
  FC 2015 Short Paper, http://fc15.ifca.ai/preproceedings/paper_112.pdf
- -"From Onions to Shallots: Rewarding Tor Relays with TEARS"
  HotPETs 2014, http://www.robgjansen.com/publications/tears-hotpets2014.pdf
- -"Payment for Anonymous Routing"
  PETS 2008, http://cs.gmu.edu/~astavrou/research/Par_PET_2008.pdf

While the TEARS paper only appeared at HotPETs (so far), I feel like it should be included because TorCoin is cited and TEARS is more viable than the TorCoin approach (IMHO) - the reasons for this are explained in the Tor incentives blog post:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-incentives-research-roundup-goldstar-par-braids-lira-tears-and-torcoin

Also, all of the above, as well as LIRA, are missing from "Incentives" node of the mind map in Figure 5. I realize that this isn't necessarily an incentives survey, but most incentive schemes affect performance and some schemes were included so it may make sense to include them all. Also, it looks like there is some whitespace below the "Throttling" node, so they may fit fairly easily.

Finally, there is no section on Tor simulators/emulators!? I was surprised by this, as that is definitely an area of research that has greatly helped explore performance questions. It would be great to include a section on it so that researchers reading this survey and looking to work on performance know which tools they can use to get started. Shadow, ExperimenTor, SNEAC, and Chutney are the main tools that immediately come to mind that may be useful in exploring performance questions.

Hope this is useful!

All the best,
Rob

> On Mar 16, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> Oh, please *do* comment.  We can easily (and definitely plan to) update
> the ePrint tech report, incorporating the feedback we get from all of
> you, and giving credit in the acknowledgements.  (Do let us know how
> you'd like to be credited.)  Once we're happy with the result, we'll
> submit a condensed (due to page limits) version to a journal.
>
>   - Ian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2x71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----