I just fixed IPv6.
~ % ping6 2001:470:164:2::2 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2605:a601:a7c3:8400:7874:a7c5:faae:76da --> 2001:470:164:2::2 16 bytes from 2001:470:164:2::2, icmp_seq=0 hlim=53 time=18.025 ms 16 bytes from 2001:470:164:2::2, icmp_seq=1 hlim=53 time=20.358 ms ^C --- 2001:470:164:2::2 ping6 statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 18.025/19.191/20.358/1.167 ms
All the best, Sina
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:24 PM Roger Dingledine arma@freehaven.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 02:05:25AM +0000, gk@torproject.org wrote:
NOTICE: faravahar had 2264 Stable flags in its vote but the consensus had 7245 NOTICE: faravahar had 1135 Guard flags in its vote but the consensus had 4625
Hi Sina,
I think faravahar's ipv6 is busted again.
It is voting 'not Running' for every relay that has an ipv6 address.
https://consensus-health.torproject.org/#ipv6stats
--Roger