November 2015 - tor-consensus-health

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

NOTICE: The certificate of the following directory authority expires within the next three weeks: moria1 (2015-12-14 11-33-16) WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

NOTICE: Downloading the consensus from Faravahar took 28.5s. Median download time is 4.3s: maatuska => 4.3s, tor26 => 3.7s, urras => 9.9s, longclaw => 4.6s, dizum => 3.2s, gabelmoo => 3.6s, moria1 => 5.8s, dannenberg => 3.3s, Faravahar => 28.5s WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 23 Nov '15

23 Nov '15

WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Re: [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues
by Damian Johnson 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

Oops, didn't realize the list accepted Linus' email (it's configured to bounce most folks). Swapped over to dir-auth@ for this thread. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Damian Johnson <atagar(a)torproject.org> wrote: >> | WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting >> | bandwidth scanner results: maatuska >> >> Hi Damien, >> >> I have a fresh file with 8706 lines in it. >> I see no strange things in maatuska's log file. >> >> Any chance the script is mistaking? >> Tom, any idea? > > Hi Linus. Nope, not a mistake. Manually checked by fetching your vote > and gabelmoo... > > % curl http://171.25.193.9:443/tor/status-vote/current/ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114B… >> /tmp/gabelmoo_vote > % grep 'Measured=' /tmp/gabelmoo_vote | wc -l > 6967 > > % curl http://171.25.193.9:443/tor/status-vote/current/49015F787433103580E3B66A170… >> /tmp/maatuska_vote > % grep 'Measured=' /tmp/maatuska_vote | wc -l > 0 > > > Unfortunately I don't have any visibility into why they are missing. > > Cheers! -Damian > > PS. Replacing tor-consensus-health@ with dir-auth@ since the list is > just for DocTor notifications.

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

2 1

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: maatuska

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

ERROR: Unable to retrieve the consensus from Faravahar (http://154.35.175.225:80/tor/status-vote/current/consensus.z) timed out

1 0

Consensus issues
by atagar＠torproject.org 21 Nov '15

21 Nov '15

NOTICE: Downloading the consensus from Faravahar took 44.9s. Median download time is 4.4s: maatuska => 5.0s, tor26 => 3.3s, urras => 6.6s, longclaw => 4.5s, dizum => 3.1s, gabelmoo => 3.9s, moria1 => 4.4s, dannenberg => 3.1s, Faravahar => 44.9s NOTICE: Consensus fetched from maatuska was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from tor26 was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from urras was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from longclaw was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from dizum was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from gabelmoo was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from moria1 was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from dannenberg was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar NOTICE: Consensus fetched from Faravahar was missing the following authority signatures: Faravahar

1 0