<p>That's a very good point klaus. </p>
<p>Joe - if you think the US Government is one big cohesive entity that funds projects consistently from a single pool of resources and money then I would politely suggest you may not have had much to do with them :P </p>
<p>Alfred <br>
</p>
<p>On 21 Mar 2011 16:27, "Klaus Layer" <<a href="mailto:klaus.layer@gmx.de">klaus.layer@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> Joe Btfsplk <<a href="mailto:joebtfsplk@gmx.com">joebtfsplk@gmx.com</a>> wrote on 21.03.2011:<br>
>> Again, WHY would Sam develop or fund technology that would make it <br>>> possible for * their enemies * to communicate anonymously and <br>>> privately, possibly allowing them to plot against him, with ABSOLUTELY <br>
>> no way to decipher that communication?<br>>> <br>> <br>> Do you really think, that there is a one Sam who makes clear decisions <br>> regarding TOR? There is a very large organization (the US) consisting of many <br>
> different people with many different opinions. Some of them don't like TOR, <br>> some thought it is an exiting research project and funded it, and others just <br>> don't care about it. <br>> <br>> Regards,<br>
> <br>> Klaus<br></p>