<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 10/27/2010 1:19 PM, Matthew wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4CC86D16.2000509@cotse.net" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 3.2 (Linux)">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin: 2cm }
P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm }
A:link { so-language: zxx }
-->
</style>
<p class="western"><font face="Arial, sans-serif">Hello, </font>
</p>
<p class="western"><font face="Arial, sans-serif">There is a
“Hints and Tips for Whistleblowers Guide” available at <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://ht4w.co.uk/">http://ht4w.co.uk/</a>.</font></p>
</blockquote>
Thanks for the link.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CC86D16.2000509@cotse.net" type="cite">
<p class="western"><font face="Arial, sans-serif"> -----How on
earth can it be “mistaken” to insist on using <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://">https://</a> encryption? Why would using <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://">https://</a> "betray the real IP addresses"?<br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
Don't know the answer to most of your questions, but you raise some
important ones. I'm not sure how, even if records of some sites you
mention are seized, they could trace directly back to you (a Tor
user) - IF using it properly, because all the seized records would
show is the exit node's address. Am I correct on this, Tor gurus?<br>
</body>
</html>