Hello Scott,<br><br>Thank you for your reply. Could you say where are the consensus documents?<br><br>Thanks.<br>ilter<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Scott Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bennett@cs.niu.edu">bennett@cs.niu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5"> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:48:43 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?ilter_y=C3=BCksel?=<br>
><<a href="mailto:ilteryuksel@gmail.com">ilteryuksel@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>Nowadays I'm reading a part of dir-spec. I noticed below sentence;<br>
><br>
>"Directory servers administrators may label some servers or IPs as<br>
>blacklisted, and elect not to include them in their network-status lists."<br>
><br>
>Could anybody explain who are these directory servers administrators? And<br>
>what is their abilities on Tor network?<br>
><br>
</div></div> That probably should have been changed long ago to read "directory<br>
authority administrators", who are, of course, those who operate the tor<br>
directory authorities, which are listed in the consensus documents with<br>
"Authority" flags.<br>
<br>
<br>
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG<br>
**********************************************************************<br>
* Internet: bennett at <a href="http://cs.niu.edu" target="_blank">cs.niu.edu</a> *<br>
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*<br>
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *<br>
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *<br>
* -- a standing army." *<br>
* -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *<br>
**********************************************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br>