It's not clear that he said that. He was sufficiently evasive to so many questions, that there are lots of ways to put it back together. It's also not clear what sort of threat his software poses. Does it do OS attacks, degradation? We just don't know what he means.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 00:25, Ted Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:teddks@gmail.com">teddks@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 17:01 -0400, Rich Jones wrote:<br>
> <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9kwph/i_am_a_guy_who_writes_covert_software_that_runs/" target="_blank">http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9kwph/i_am_a_guy_who_writes_covert_software_that_runs/</a><br>
><br>
> Thoughts?<br>
><br>
> also, I realized that two of the posts I've made this this list have<br>
> now been reddit-related. Sorry about that. But I'd really like to know<br>
> what you all make of this. He doesn't give very many specifics,<br>
> unfortunately. What do you think his 'sidestepping' is?<br>
><br>
> R<br>
<br>
</div></div>The jig is up guys, apparently lateral thinking bypasses Tor.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>