Then perhaps complaining about the direction of the work that many others have done pro bono is a little premature, no?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:18, Peter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:necedemalis@gmail.com">necedemalis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Heh, well, I tell you what. You send me a hundred thousand dollars,<br>
and after the check clears I'll write you a great windows kernel<br>
driver. Otherwise, I'm broke, my life is a living hell, and I already<br>
have several projects I work on out of the goodness of my heart, so,<br>
I'm sorry.<br>
<br>
Thanks and good luck.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Flamsmark<<a href="mailto:flamsmark@gmail.com">flamsmark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Why not just a Windows kernel driver? Because it hasn't been written yet.<br>
> You're welcome to help write a kernel driver, or a VPN host or whatever else<br>
> you think is the next logical step to improving Tor. However, remember the<br>
> version number: 0.2.1.*. Tor is not a 'finished' piece of software. It is<br>
> not feature-complete; it does not implement everything that's either desired<br>
> or required for ideal use. However, right now, much of the development<br>
> effort is not spent making it easier for clients to use. There's a feeling<br>
> that it's currently 'good enough' that those who really need to use Tor will<br>
> be able to follow the instructions and get it working. If you don't agree<br>
> with that emphasis, again, it's your prerogative to build those feature that<br>
> you think are most important.<br>
> We all look forward to seeing your contributions!<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>