<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Curious Kid <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:letsshareinformation@yahoo.com">letsshareinformation@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message ----<br>
> From: Bill McGonigle <<a href="mailto:bill@bfccomputing.com">bill@bfccomputing.com</a>><br>
> To: <a href="mailto:or-talk@freehaven.net">or-talk@freehaven.net</a><br>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 7:18:07 PM<br>
> Subject: Re: General question about exit policies...<br>
><br>
> On 06/30/2009 10:20 PM, Michael wrote:<br>
> > accept *.<a href="http://google.com:80" target="_blank">google.com:80</a><br>
><br>
> thinking aloud...<br>
><br>
> What if:<br>
><br>
> o Google was supportive of "good" uses of Tor, for its services<br>
<br>
That appears impossible. Google needs to filter content based on where you live, analyze web trends, and serve you contextual advertising based what you do and see.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Google could absolutely do this in a reduced-bandwidth fashion: allow tor freely, track anonymity trending, develop non-free tools based on said trends at google labs, sell them back to you, and profit. Google Semi-AnonyDesktop. Yuck.<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Punkle Jones // cDc/NSF NON-31337 humanoid<br>