<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=gb2312">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
        font-family: 宋体;
}
@font-face {
        font-family: Verdana;
}
@font-face {
        font-family: @宋体;
}
@page Section1 {size: 595.3pt 841.9pt; margin: 72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; layout-grid: 15.6pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
        TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
LI.MsoNormal {
        TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
        TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
A:link {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
        FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: windowtext; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-DECORATION: none; mso-style-type: personal-compose
}
DIV.Section1 {
        page: Section1
}
UNKNOWN {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt
}
BLOCKQUOTE {
        MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 2em
}
OL {
        MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
UL {
        MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana">
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><SPAN>Hi Scott Bennett</SPAN>,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">Thanks for your kind reply. I&nbsp;agree with your 
deduction&nbsp;that&nbsp;the possibility you 
mentioned&nbsp;that&nbsp;inside&nbsp;tor&nbsp;somewhere&nbsp;that&nbsp;causes&nbsp;tor&nbsp;to&nbsp;forget&nbsp;to&nbsp;post&nbsp;a&nbsp;descriptor&nbsp;update&nbsp;after&nbsp;the&nbsp;usual&nbsp;18&nbsp;hours&nbsp;have 
elapsed. I will&nbsp;read the source code about it.</DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></DIV></FONT></FONT><FONT face=Verdana 
color=#000080 size=2><FONT color=#000000></FONT>
<HR>
</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><STRONG>发件人:</STRONG> Scott Bennett </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><STRONG>发送时间:</STRONG> 2009-06-04&nbsp; 18:10:32 
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><STRONG>收件人:</STRONG> lingzhen1982; or-talk 
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><STRONG>抄送:</STRONG> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2><STRONG>主题:</STRONG> Re: My exit node is gone 
from the node list </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;On&nbsp;Thu,&nbsp;4&nbsp;Jun&nbsp;2009&nbsp;11:55:28&nbsp;+0800&nbsp;"lingzhen1982"&nbsp;&lt;lingzhen1982@gmail.com&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>wrote:</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;For&nbsp;several&nbsp;months,&nbsp;I've&nbsp;been&nbsp;running&nbsp;a&nbsp;tor&nbsp;exit&nbsp;node&nbsp;(Nickname:&nbsp;AllenHomeTor,&nbsp;IP&nbsp;address:&nbsp;98.216.176.128,&nbsp;Version:0.2.0.30(r15956)).&nbsp;Since&nbsp;a&nbsp;few&nbsp;days,&nbsp;it&nbsp;seems&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;vanished&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;list&nbsp;of&nbsp;nodes.&nbsp;And&nbsp;I&nbsp;try&nbsp;to&nbsp;make&nbsp;it&nbsp;reappear&nbsp;by&nbsp;using&nbsp;a&nbsp;new&nbsp;nickname&nbsp;AllenUSATor(fingerprint:&nbsp;443E&nbsp;035C&nbsp;B856&nbsp;5904&nbsp;AE98&nbsp;8DAB&nbsp;3059&nbsp;9A0D&nbsp;2C4C&nbsp;340C),&nbsp;but&nbsp;I&nbsp;am&nbsp;failed.&nbsp;How&nbsp;can&nbsp;I&nbsp;make&nbsp;it&nbsp;reappear?&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;First,&nbsp;you&nbsp;should&nbsp;not&nbsp;be&nbsp;running&nbsp;that&nbsp;version&nbsp;of&nbsp;tor.&nbsp;&nbsp;Currently&nbsp;valid</DIV>
<DIV>versions&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;stable&nbsp;branch&nbsp;are&nbsp;0.2.0.33&nbsp;and&nbsp;0.2.0.34&nbsp;for&nbsp;both&nbsp;clients&nbsp;and</DIV>
<DIV>relays.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Second,&nbsp;when&nbsp;tor&nbsp;starts&nbsp;up,&nbsp;does&nbsp;it&nbsp;issue&nbsp;a&nbsp;message&nbsp;that&nbsp;says&nbsp;that&nbsp;your</DIV>
<DIV>node&nbsp;is&nbsp;reachable&nbsp;from&nbsp;outside?&nbsp;&nbsp;If&nbsp;not,&nbsp;then&nbsp;you&nbsp;probably&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;NAT/RDR</DIV>
<DIV>problem&nbsp;to&nbsp;settle&nbsp;with&nbsp;your&nbsp;gateway.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Third,&nbsp;if&nbsp;tor&nbsp;does&nbsp;find&nbsp;itself&nbsp;reachable&nbsp;soon&nbsp;after&nbsp;startup,&nbsp;does&nbsp;it&nbsp;ever</DIV>
<DIV>issue&nbsp;a&nbsp;message&nbsp;that&nbsp;says&nbsp;its&nbsp;IP&nbsp;address&nbsp;appears&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;changed?&nbsp;&nbsp;Or&nbsp;that&nbsp;its</DIV>
<DIV>DNS&nbsp;queries&nbsp;appear&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;hijacked?&nbsp;&nbsp;In&nbsp;the&nbsp;former&nbsp;case&nbsp;tor&nbsp;should,&nbsp;after</DIV>
<DIV>passing&nbsp;another&nbsp;reachability&nbsp;test,&nbsp;simply&nbsp;publish&nbsp;a&nbsp;new&nbsp;descriptor&nbsp;bearing&nbsp;the</DIV>
<DIV>new&nbsp;IP&nbsp;address.&nbsp;&nbsp;In&nbsp;the&nbsp;latter&nbsp;case,&nbsp;tor&nbsp;should&nbsp;stop&nbsp;operating&nbsp;as&nbsp;an&nbsp;exit&nbsp;and</DIV>
<DIV>issue&nbsp;a&nbsp;message&nbsp;to&nbsp;that&nbsp;effect,&nbsp;while&nbsp;continuing&nbsp;to&nbsp;operate&nbsp;as&nbsp;a&nbsp;non-exit</DIV>
<DIV>relay.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&gt;In&nbsp;addtion,&nbsp;my&nbsp;traffic&nbsp;logs&nbsp;suggest&nbsp;that&nbsp;the&nbsp;node&nbsp;is&nbsp;used&nbsp;as&nbsp;much&nbsp;as&nbsp;it&nbsp;could&nbsp;be.&nbsp;There&nbsp;are&nbsp;much&nbsp;traffic&nbsp;like&nbsp;BitTorrent.&nbsp;I&nbsp;am&nbsp;confused.&nbsp;How&nbsp;can&nbsp;these&nbsp;guys&nbsp;select&nbsp;my&nbsp;exit&nbsp;node&nbsp;even&nbsp;my&nbsp;node&nbsp;has&nbsp;vanished&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;list&nbsp;of&nbsp;nodes?&nbsp;BTW,&nbsp;to&nbsp;avoid&nbsp;too&nbsp;much&nbsp;BitTorrent&nbsp;traffic,&nbsp;I&nbsp;change&nbsp;my&nbsp;exit&nbsp;policy&nbsp;to&nbsp;only&nbsp;accept&nbsp;port&nbsp;80&nbsp;now.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;How&nbsp;can&nbsp;you&nbsp;tell&nbsp;what&nbsp;sort&nbsp;of&nbsp;traffic&nbsp;it&nbsp;is&nbsp;if&nbsp;your&nbsp;node&nbsp;is&nbsp;no&nbsp;longer&nbsp;an</DIV>
<DIV>exit&nbsp;node?&nbsp;&nbsp;Why&nbsp;close&nbsp;all&nbsp;those&nbsp;other&nbsp;non-Bittorrent&nbsp;ports&nbsp;as&nbsp;well?</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&gt;I&nbsp;look&nbsp;forward&nbsp;from&nbsp;your&nbsp;feedback,&nbsp;and&nbsp;thank&nbsp;all&nbsp;responders&nbsp;in&nbsp;advance.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;There&nbsp;remains&nbsp;another&nbsp;possibility.&nbsp;&nbsp;As&nbsp;several&nbsp;of&nbsp;us&nbsp;have&nbsp;reported&nbsp;here</DIV>
<DIV>in&nbsp;the&nbsp;past,&nbsp;there&nbsp;has&nbsp;been&nbsp;a&nbsp;gremlin&nbsp;lurking&nbsp;inside&nbsp;tor&nbsp;somewhere&nbsp;that&nbsp;causes</DIV>
<DIV>tor&nbsp;to&nbsp;forget&nbsp;to&nbsp;post&nbsp;a&nbsp;descriptor&nbsp;update&nbsp;after&nbsp;the&nbsp;usual&nbsp;18&nbsp;hours&nbsp;have</DIV>
<DIV>elapsed.&nbsp;&nbsp;I&nbsp;haven't&nbsp;yet&nbsp;seen&nbsp;it&nbsp;happen&nbsp;with&nbsp;0.2.1.14-rc,&nbsp;but&nbsp;it&nbsp;was&nbsp;a&nbsp;headache</DIV>
<DIV>with&nbsp;some&nbsp;earlier&nbsp;versions.&nbsp;&nbsp;However,&nbsp;when&nbsp;you&nbsp;changed&nbsp;your&nbsp;torrc,&nbsp;whether&nbsp;for</DIV>
<DIV>the&nbsp;change&nbsp;of&nbsp;nickname&nbsp;and&nbsp;identifier&nbsp;or&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;change&nbsp;of&nbsp;exit&nbsp;policy,&nbsp;tor</DIV>
<DIV>should&nbsp;still&nbsp;have&nbsp;published&nbsp;a&nbsp;new&nbsp;descriptor&nbsp;reflecting&nbsp;either&nbsp;of&nbsp;those</DIV>
<DIV>changes,&nbsp;so&nbsp;the&nbsp;authorities&nbsp;ought&nbsp;to&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;new&nbsp;descriptor&nbsp;for&nbsp;at&nbsp;least&nbsp;another</DIV>
<DIV>18&nbsp;hours.&nbsp;&nbsp;Try&nbsp;upgrading&nbsp;to&nbsp;a&nbsp;current&nbsp;version&nbsp;of&nbsp;tor,&nbsp;and&nbsp;then&nbsp;check&nbsp;it&nbsp;a</DIV>
<DIV>couple&nbsp;of&nbsp;times&nbsp;a&nbsp;day&nbsp;(or&nbsp;more&nbsp;often&nbsp;if&nbsp;you&nbsp;like)&nbsp;for&nbsp;a&nbsp;while&nbsp;to&nbsp;see&nbsp;whether</DIV>
<DIV>the&nbsp;problem&nbsp;recurs.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Scott&nbsp;Bennett,&nbsp;Comm.&nbsp;ASMELG,&nbsp;CFIAG</DIV>
<DIV>**********************************************************************</DIV>
<DIV>*&nbsp;Internet:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;bennett&nbsp;at&nbsp;cs.niu.edu&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</DIV>
<DIV>*--------------------------------------------------------------------*</DIV>
<DIV>*&nbsp;"A&nbsp;well&nbsp;regulated&nbsp;and&nbsp;disciplined&nbsp;militia,&nbsp;is&nbsp;at&nbsp;all&nbsp;times&nbsp;a&nbsp;good&nbsp;&nbsp;*</DIV>
<DIV>*&nbsp;objection&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;introduction&nbsp;of&nbsp;that&nbsp;bane&nbsp;of&nbsp;all&nbsp;free&nbsp;governments&nbsp;*</DIV>
<DIV>*&nbsp;--&nbsp;a&nbsp;standing&nbsp;army."&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</DIV>
<DIV>*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;--&nbsp;Gov.&nbsp;John&nbsp;Hancock,&nbsp;New&nbsp;York&nbsp;Journal,&nbsp;28&nbsp;January&nbsp;1790&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</DIV>
<DIV>**********************************************************************</DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>