Well, Firefox rendes HTML as fast as it is possible (instead of IE6), so I dont think it is the reason. You can also try wget or something - it takes hell long time to receive first byte of response and then it is fast enough.<br>
<br>Original question was very simple: Where is the main difference between Tor and JAP design, that JAP is spreading bandwidth much better than Tor?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Marek<span class="vcb_rt"></span><br><br>Keep in mind, that I dont judge JAP from security view, just performance.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mitar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mmitar@gmail.com">mmitar@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>Have you tried other browsers? For example some text only browser?<br>
Maybe they have different strategy for loading and displaying things<br>
which is better for user experience over links with larger latency.<br>
(Like displaying just HTML without images and CSS and JS at the<br>
beginning and then slowly everything else.)<br>
<br>
This would be an interesting thing to measure - how different browsers<br>
cope with latencies and how the user experience this strategies.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>