I tried wget test now and Im confused a little bit.<br><br>------<br>me@computer:~$ export http_proxy=<a href="http://localhost:8118">http://localhost:8118</a><br>me@computer:~$ wget <a href="http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso">http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso</a><br>
--2009-02-13 15:06:10-- <a href="http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso">http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso</a><br>Překládám localhost… 127.0.0.1<br>Navazuje se spojení s localhost|127.0.0.1|:8118… spojeno.<br>
Proxy požadavek odeslán, program čeká na odpověď… 200 OK<br>Délka: 732766208 (699M) [application/x-iso9660-image]<br>Ukládám do: „ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso.3".<br><br> 0% [ ] 1 925 103 424K/s <br>
<br>--------<br><br>It received first bytes after ~ 4 seconds and run for 420kB/s. It is probably plot against my person, because I never had so good results :-).<br><br>Nodes I used: kallio, Bellum, bach<br><br>It is probably just luck, that these nodes are free now. Do you agree that this is not typical case, right?<br>
<br>Marek<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, slush <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slush@slush.cz">slush@slush.cz</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Well, Firefox rendes HTML as fast as it is possible (instead of IE6), so I dont think it is the reason. You can also try wget or something - it takes hell long time to receive first byte of response and then it is fast enough.<br>
<br>Original question was very simple: Where is the main difference between Tor and JAP design, that JAP is spreading bandwidth much better than Tor?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Marek<span></span><br><br></blockquote></div><br>