Hi Roger,<br><br>Im in same situation as Matt. Im running Tor exit on VPS, version 0.2.0.x. So each MB of memory is quite bit expensive for me :). Do you personally think that running 0.2.1.x (so experimental branch, but less memory usage) on production machine is a good idea? Stability is the main issue, but I have overall good experience with Tor (except issue with certificates ;).<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Marek<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/11/9 Roger Dingledine <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arma@mit.edu">arma@mit.edu</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 03:40:30PM -0600, Matt LaPlante wrote:<br>
> bandwidth. My one gripe was that the Tor daemon in 0.1.X sucked a lot<br>
> of my very limited memory allocation, even when not accepting exits.<br>
<br>
</div>It sure did. Mainly on Linux.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> Having recently upgraded to 0.2.X due to its inclusion in Intrepid,<br>
> I've seen a *drastic* improvement in memory efficiency. The new<br>
> version appears magnitudes lighter on resources using the same<br>
> configuration. This is a big deal to me, and I just wanted to give<br>
> thanks to the developers for focusing on performance as well as<br>
> functionality. Keep up the good work!<br>
<br>
</div>Great. Glad you like it.<br>
<br>
And if you like 0.2.0.x's memory usage, you'll like 0.2.1.x's even more! :)<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--Roger<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div>