<div>So that design would work:</div>
<div><a href="http://smallsister.org/show_image.php?id=5">http://smallsister.org/show_image.php?id=5</a></div>
<div><br> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:54 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dr._no@cool.ms">dr._no@cool.ms</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi,<br><br>yes, i started my TOR exit node with port 25 open (default is close)<br>and half a year later my provide sent me a letter that my PC is<br>
sending many spam mails permanent and that i should check my PC<br>for malware.<br>Because i could not find an email relay i could forward the mails to,<br>i closed port 25.<br><br>So TOR is in use as an email mixmaster.<br>
<br>Regards,<br><br>Rolf<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="Wj3C7c"><br>><br>> Hi<br>><br>> want to know, if tor is as well an email mixmaster,<br>> e.g. we have an email client, which is sending only pgp encrypted<br>> emails,<br>> then the ISP is excluded as he cannot read, but data retention laws<br>
> allow to log the IP from where the email is sent and the email server<br>> knows the last exit point of the encrypted package (email).<br>> If now in this email client an onion routing system would be enabled,<br>
> then all email (enc. Packages) would be routed, and some exit nodes<br>> would deliver them.<br>> Is this already possible with Tor? Are there enough exit nodes? would<br>> it be possible and useful for email services to force every node to<br>
> be an exit node for encry. packets to email accounts? how much<br>> bandwidth is a node requiring then for mixing/forwarding emails only?<br>> are there developers working on that? or interested?<br>><br>><br>
> Regards<br><br><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>