<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:24 PM, scar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scar@drigon.com">scar@drigon.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
got this from an EFF update, so i'm sure a lot of you have seen it.<br>
but, in case you haven't:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10040152-38.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10040152-38.html</a><br>
<br>
Declan McCullough reports on a proposal to more directly track the<br>
source of IP traffic, edited by, among others, Cisco, a Chinese<br>
ministry, and the NSA.<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
iD8DBQFI3cNwXhfCJNu98qARCNdVAKClb1/0ImC5sZB3/TdXsBzpZMtN4wCgrKs3<br>
uOEINSxwFRrbuffC15METrk=<br>
=Rxgj<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br>Great article! Thank you for posting it.<br>
<br>
This is type of thing is very scary.<br>
I think Jacob is right; this type of system would be sought after by
hackers world wide, and in the wrong hands could be very dangerous.<br>Not cool. <br></div>