<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 10, 2007 1:27 PM, Roger Dingledine <<a href="mailto:arma@mit.edu">arma@mit.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:54:52PM -0800, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:<br>> Do you also think Tor should automatically block access to all RFC 1918<br>> address space unless otherwise enabled? Why should Tor be so automatic
<br>> about your specific preferences?<br><br></div>Actually Jake, Tor already does automatically reject the RFC<br>1918 addresses in your exit policy, unless you change your<br>ExitPolicyRejectPrivate config option from 1 to 0.
<br><br>I just changed it so it also adds your relay's public (external) IP<br>address too:<br><a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Nov-2007/msg00154.html" target="_blank">http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Nov-2007/msg00154.html
</a><br><br>This change will be in the 0.2.0.11-alpha release (it's too late to put<br>it in the 0.2.0.10-alpha release), and will probably make its way into<br><a href="http://0.1.2.19" target="_blank">0.1.2.19</a> (whenever that comes out) too.
<br><br>Thanks,<br><font color="#888888">--Roger<br><br></font></blockquote></div><br>Thank you! :)<br><br>- Kyle<br>