Hello TOR people, Yay! I did finally get server up, but all is not completely good: Anyone interested please note log entries.Thanks for advice and support. <br>I hope to have it working perfectly soon. Am not sure exactly what to think of entries below:<br>*****************************************<br>Oct 29 03:31:32.969 [Notice] Tor v0.2.0.7-alpha (r11572). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Linux i686)<br>Oct 29 03:31:32.975 [Notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a using method epoll. Good.<br>Oct 29 03:31:32.979 [Notice] Opening OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9001<br>Oct 29 03:31:33.131 [Notice] Opening Directory listener on 0.0.0.0:9030<br>Oct 29 03:31:33.138 [Notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050<br>Oct 29 03:31:33.142 [Notice] Opening Control listener on 127.0.0.1:9051<br>Oct 29 03:31:46.978 [Notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working.<br>Oct 29 03:32:19.088 [Notice]
Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent.<br>Oct 29 03:32:45.443 [Notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.<br>Oct 29 03:33:41.789 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed<br>Oct 29 03:33:41.872 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up<br>Oct 29 03:33:46.790 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed<br>Oct 29 03:33:46.856 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up<br>************************************************<br><br> I can see from the Bandwith Graph that some traffic does flow through, though not a lot. Is this normal? Is it OK that I get a "nameserver" error and how can that problem be solved?? The listed back up is my normal DNS at comcast.
<br> Algenon<br><br><b><i>algenon flower <algenon_flower@yahoo.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Hello <b><i>Pei Hanru, </i></b>experienced TOR users<br> I have checked Linksys doc's and I think they were helpful. At present, I think I need to assign a static IP to my RHEL system behind NAT firewall. That seems to include two
extra assigned IP numbers, like 196.168.1.20, Then I can use port forwarding set-up on NAT router. I bet this is elementary school for many of you, it took a little while for me :),, All I need now is the procedure to assign a static IP on RHEL. I am checking that now,, And, Hope it all Works! In any case, thanks to people interested, and additional comments welcome.<br> peace, Algenon<br><br><b><i>Pei Hanru <peihanru@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>On
2007-10-27 06:23 CST, algenon flower wrote:<br>> Hello Michael Holstein and other interested people<br>> I thought I had accomplished port forwarding (see attached file) but<br>> did not succeed. After checking with Linksys support site I am going to<br>> try a new apporach. Will study the doc's from Linksys, if anyone has<br>> experience with this please let me know.<br>> Algenon<br><br>Unfortunately, you are doing worse...<br><br>What you should do is first figuring out the *actual* private IP address<br>of your Linux box, then forwarding port 9001 and port 9030 (or port<br>range 9001-9030 if you like) to *that* address, rather than forwarding<br>the same port range to three distinct addresses.<br><br>It's a good idea to reread port forwarding part of Linksys manual carefully.<br><br>Hanru<br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)<br>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org<br><br>iD8DBQFHJDrrtHG285r2MGoRAvAJAKDLRHZYc/5ZRXeNgaIXnZHUr/2zXgCeOqji<br>h67261xOLOYdjvEyADPndks=<br>=EmPN<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br></blockquote><br><div> __________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com </div></blockquote><br><p> __________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com