<div>I have to say that the torcp doesn't seem at all unstable in the windows xp home service pack one world. Despite reassurances, I still have doubts about the true intentions of vidalia but it could be that my paranoia has gotten the best of me. Look at it this way:
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. Implemented into tor without any previous notice</div>
<div>2. The server browsing software on their site is called trac</div>
<div>3. There is an unexplained QT symbol in the about menu</div>
<div>4. Either they changed this or I can't find it. It said created by and then had a suspicious name like watchwear or something.</div>
<div>I will personally audit the source code for this to satisfy my paranoia and I'll report back.</div>
<div>Ringo<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/1/06, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:mbgsvq102@sneakemail.com">mbgsvq102@sneakemail.com</a></b> <<a href="mailto:mbgsvq102@sneakemail.com">mbgsvq102@sneakemail.com</a>> wrote:
</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>> Also, it would be good to know why a GUI to TOR is
<br>> called Vidalia? Where is the connection between the<br>> names? Why was Vidalia chosen as name?<br><br>I was also curious about the connection until I Googled Vidalia. It<br>turns out that a Vidalia is a type of sweet onion. ;-)
<br><br><a href="http://www.vidaliaonion.com/">http://www.vidaliaonion.com/</a><br><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)<br><br>iD8DBQFEfrjIl9EdKsM4xmERAsNDAKCpoM7S1z+ctVhTd9yBOa/nWnFj+gCdHb6X
<br>JlgY8BboMzA2oSI+SKsDGYg=<br>=DJ3o<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br></blockquote></div><br>