<html><head></head><body>Also you didn't migrate your fingerprint. So it's a new server and will take weeks if not months for the consensus weight to creep up.<br><br><br>-- <br>Matt Westfall<br>President & CIO <br>ECAN Solutions, Inc. <br>804.592.1672 <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On December 16, 2019 1:30:48 PM EST, Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hi,<br><br>After having my Primcast.com dedicated server suspended, I signed up for <br>a dedicated server from Psychz Networks in their Dallas location to run <br>a FreeBSD-powered Tor exit relay.<br><br><a href="https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F">https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9B6672E247BC4656915DF03A470D4B5BC2E7601F</a><br><br>While Psychz is a bit more expensive than Primcast/ServerRoom (and that <br>is with an special offer), I get a slightly faster server and far better <br>customer support.<br><br>One problem is that the consensus weight value is rather low in <br>proportion to the advertised bandwidth value, when they should be <br>approximately similar.<br><br>In fact, my server's CPU usage never goes beyond 1%.<br><br>Is this normal now that sbws is being deployed? Or is it bad peering on <br>my relay?<br><br>-Neel<hr><a href="https://www.neelc.org/">https://www.neelc.org/</a><hr>tor-relays mailing list<br>tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<br><a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays">https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>